Advanced  

Latest Result

Semi Final Sydney Showgrounds
Sun, 17 Sep 2017 • 17:25 WST
West Coast Greater Western Sydney
9.4 (58) 19.11 (125)
Game Focus

Next Game

Round 1 Perth Stadium
Sun, 25 Mar 2018 • 16:20 WST
West Coast v Sydney
Game Focus



Gay Marriage + or -?

Discuss whatever you like, whenever you like, however you like

Moderators: Streaker, Mr Q

Re: Gay Marriage + or -?

Postby HH on Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:31 pm

MrWoollie wrote:Ah yes. you have the right to be bigoted and to discriminate as long as you are doing it in accordance with your religious beliefs.

Edit: not directed at any one individual here, just a general comment.


Hmmmm. So what did Alex Greenwich really mean when he said the following during the yes campaign:

Alex Greenwich, co-convener of Australian Marriage Equality, said the ‚Äėyes‚Äô campaign had always been clear about its disinterest in impeding on religion.

‚ÄúNothing in the proposed legislation would in any way impact the religious celebration of marriage or the ways churches wish to practice it,‚ÄĚ Mr Greenwich said.

“There are protections ranging from ensuring a minister of religion is able to marry the couples that he or she wants to, to what can happen on church grounds.

“There are clear, strong and robust religious protections in the draft legislation
.‚ÄĚ

The same-sex marriage campaign focused on civil marriage, not the religious celebration of marriage, Mr Greenwich said.
User avatar
HH
EFH Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: Captain’s Club

Re: Gay Marriage + or -?

Postby Mr Q on Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:15 pm

It means that churches won't be forced to perform dame seed marriages. That's it.

It does *not* mean that other people's in society will get to discriminate.
"I like to pay taxes. With them I buy civilisation" - Oliver Wendell Holmes
Alternative facts, alternative facts, pants on fire....
User avatar
Mr Q
EFH Posting Lunatic
 
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:59 pm
Location: Block 331

Re: Gay Marriage + or -?

Postby farmer joe on Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:18 pm

The Shoppies controlled Senators are going to vote No.....but it is only the right that has religious nut jobs in it isnt it...
http://www.watoday.com.au/federal-polit ... zu6zf.html
farmer joe
EFH Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Gay Marriage + or -?

Postby Mr Q on Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:28 am

farmer joe wrote:The Shoppies controlled Senators are going to vote No.....but it is only the right that has religious nut jobs in it isnt it...
http://www.watoday.com.au/federal-polit ... zu6zf.html


You know something, I don't think anyone has said that. What people *have* pointed out is that the religious right have the Liberal Party by the nuts - and denying that is to deny what's right in front of your face.

The ALP have allowed a conscience vote on this issue for a long time. The Liberals didn't or we wouldn't have just wasted $120 million on this idiotic survey (that just got back exactly the result that all the polling said it would), because the shrinking moderate wing of the Libs would have got it across the line back in 2012.

What's happening to the Liberal Party is very clever by the religious right. They realised that under their own banner, they stood no chance whatsoever of getting more than token representation in Parliament (in line with exactly how many people are really that far to the right). So instead they started infiltrating the Liberal Party, getting candidates pre-selected where moderates stand down (see Ian Goodenough replacing Mal Washer as a good example). By doing that, they can get way more power through holding a major party to ransom than they ever would standing as a Christian party.

Since politics isn't all about religion (at least to everyone outside the RR, for who religion is the main focus), there were bound to be religious people at both ends of the political spectrum.
"I like to pay taxes. With them I buy civilisation" - Oliver Wendell Holmes
Alternative facts, alternative facts, pants on fire....
User avatar
Mr Q
EFH Posting Lunatic
 
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:59 pm
Location: Block 331

Re: Gay Marriage + or -?

Postby Fair Bump Play On on Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:26 pm

Mr Q wrote:What's happening to the Liberal Party is very clever by the religious right. They realised that under their own banner, they stood no chance whatsoever of getting more than token representation in Parliament (in line with exactly how many people are really that far to the right). So instead they started infiltrating the Liberal Party, getting candidates pre-selected where moderates stand down (see Ian Goodenough replacing Mal Washer as a good example). By doing that, they can get way more power through holding a major party to ransom than they ever would standing as a Christian party.


Not that cleaver really in my opinion; simply following the model previously used in the USA, that has allowed the religious right to gain control of the republican party, turning a party or social libertarianism into a party of social conservatives. Insert themselves in to local councils, lobby groups, other powerful groups (such as the AMA or Shoppies), the media, party branches, gain party nominations over moderates and eventually gain control of the Party. The main difference here holding them back compared to the USA is the lack of active Christian's in Australia - especially the ultra-conservative type. Thus, they can at times gain 'effective*' control of the Liberal's (Tony) or National’s (and try with the Labor Party) but their extreme ideas will simply not wash with the population as a whole. Yet, it's only just begun.
Proud 2017 sponsor of Liam -Dangerfield- Duggan, Will Schofield, Simon - the tank - Tunbridge & Tom Gorter
Past sponsor; 2016 self appointed sponsor of Sam it's better with Butler, 2015 of Jamie lace out Bennell, Scooter - future vice-captain - Selwood. 2013 of Mitch - Mr Required - Brown, (And he stayed), 2012 of Scott - the future - Lycett, (And he is), 2011 of Vice Captain ‚Äď fair, but get out of his way - Beau Waters, (His greatest year)
User avatar
Fair Bump Play On
EFH Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 4:06 pm
Location: Getting hot on this globe.

Re: Gay Marriage + or -?

Postby MelbourneBased on Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:54 pm

All I can say is $120 million spent by the Government to confirm that the poll came in inline with the majority of Australian attitudes of equality (race,religion,creed, or orientation)
But when it came to bigger issues, like losing money to the big 4 plus MacBank, then the Government play the money card.

Try and explain that to the kids
MelbourneBased
Rookie
 
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 5:36 pm

Previous

Return to General Board, Suggestions and Problems

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron